Difference between revisions of "RBEM/Implementation"

From The Crowdsourced Resource-Based Economy Knowledgebase
Jump to: navigation, search
(Training Arena)
m (Training Arena)
 
(10 intermediate revisions by one user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
There is no consent yet about how to implement the ideas of a [[Resource-Based Economic Model]]. Generally, there are two approaches: [[Bottom-Up Implementation of a Resource-Based Economy|bottom-up]] and [[Top-Down Implementation of a Resource-Based Economy|top-down]]. For the two general approaches there exist many potential variations, for example [[RBEM/Strategies for integration with the monetary market|different degrees of interaction with the monetary market in RBEM projects]] to interactions with the monetary system.
+
{{Incomplete}}
 +
There is no consensus yet about how to implement the ideas of a [[Resource-Based Economic Model]]{{POV-statement}}.
  
Advocates of bottom-up approaches argue for starting with [[RBEM Implementation Projects|RBEM implementation projects]] soon, for incrementally developing the implemented methods and for incrementally increasing the participation, either on a individual basis or by including more and more people{{Cn}}. Advocates of top-down approaches rather think that people could be distracted from the general RBEM ideas because of problems that arise from specific RBEM implementation projects. They support educating as many people as possible and planning as many details as possible, before starting to implement a Resource-Based Economy{{Cn}}. Of course also hybrid approaches are conceivable.
+
== Bottom-up and Top-down approaches ==
 
+
Advocates of bottom-up approaches argue for starting with [[RBEM/Global_Network#Implementation_Projects|RBEM implementation projects]] soon, for incrementally developing the implemented methods and for incrementally increasing the participation, either on a individual basis or by including more and more people{{Cn}}. Advocates of top-down approaches rather think that people could be distracted from the general RBEM ideas because of problems that arise from specific RBEM implementation projects. They support educating as many people as possible and planning as many details as possible, before starting to implement a Resource-Based Economy{{Cn}}. Of course also hybrid approaches are conceivable.
== Pros and Cons of Bottom-Up Approaches ==
+
  
 +
=== Pros and Cons of Bottom-Up Approaches ===
 
{{Main|Bottom-Up Implementation of a Resource-Based Economy}}
 
{{Main|Bottom-Up Implementation of a Resource-Based Economy}}
  
== Pros and Cons of Top-Down Approaches ==
+
=== Pros and Cons of Top-Down Approaches ===
 +
{{Main|Top-Down Implementation of a Resource-Based Economy}}
  
{{Main|Top-Down Implementation of a Resource-Based Economy}}
+
== Degrees of interaction with the Monetary Market System ==
 
+
{{Main | RBEM/Strategies for integration with the monetary market | l1=Degrees of interaction with the Monetary Market System}}
Leaders rise naturally{{Vague}}{{Examples}}{{CN}}.
+
  
 
== Training Arena ==
 
== Training Arena ==
{{Main|/Training Arena}}
+
{{Main|/Training Arena | l1 = RBE Training Arenas (RBE-TAs)}}
  
 
RBE Training Arenas (RBE-TAs) may be an option for enabling currently established communities to begin a gradual transformation into an RBE. With RBE-TAs developing all over a web of support for experimental settlements, settlements could be like graduate school.
 
RBE Training Arenas (RBE-TAs) may be an option for enabling currently established communities to begin a gradual transformation into an RBE. With RBE-TAs developing all over a web of support for experimental settlements, settlements could be like graduate school.
Line 27: Line 28:
 
* [[Permaculture]]: http://www.permaculture.org.au/, http://www.urbanharvest.org/permaculture/resources.html, http://www.northeystreetcityfarm.org.au/
 
* [[Permaculture]]: http://www.permaculture.org.au/, http://www.urbanharvest.org/permaculture/resources.html, http://www.northeystreetcityfarm.org.au/
 
* [[Living off-grid]]: http://www.off-grid.net/
 
* [[Living off-grid]]: http://www.off-grid.net/
 +
 +
== References ==
 +
{{reflist}}

Latest revision as of 18:10, 1 March 2013

There is no consensus yet about how to implement the ideas of a Resource-Based Economic Model[neutrality is disputed].

Contents

[edit] Bottom-up and Top-down approaches

Advocates of bottom-up approaches argue for starting with RBEM implementation projects soon, for incrementally developing the implemented methods and for incrementally increasing the participation, either on a individual basis or by including more and more people[citation needed]. Advocates of top-down approaches rather think that people could be distracted from the general RBEM ideas because of problems that arise from specific RBEM implementation projects. They support educating as many people as possible and planning as many details as possible, before starting to implement a Resource-Based Economy[citation needed]. Of course also hybrid approaches are conceivable.

[edit] Pros and Cons of Bottom-Up Approaches

[edit] Pros and Cons of Top-Down Approaches

[edit] Degrees of interaction with the Monetary Market System

[edit] Training Arena

RBE Training Arenas (RBE-TAs) may be an option for enabling currently established communities to begin a gradual transformation into an RBE. With RBE-TAs developing all over a web of support for experimental settlements, settlements could be like graduate school.

[edit] External links

[edit] References

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox
Share