Gaianism (book)/Introduction/Religion
This is the Why a religion Chapter of the Introduction section of the book Gaianism.
Why a religion
 | This chapter is a stub. |
If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch,
you must first invent the universe.
Understanding why Gaianism is designed as a religion requires, first, understanding Gaianism's main principle and main purpose, being consistency and safeguarding humanity, respectively. The notion of consistency is applicable in a range of contexts, for example intellectual honesty is a form of consistency between held beliefs and factual knowledge, and intellectual rigour being the consistency of standards. Safeguarding humanity is also applicable in a range of contexts, such as, biologically, meaning protecting the human species from undue extinction, and culturally, meaning protecting what which we can come to understand as our humanity. Everything Gaianism represents spans directly or indirectly from this principle and purpose. These fundamental characteristics define, support and reinforce each other, however it is important to maintain an awareness that they're both arbitrary choices, and therefore do not require being explained or justified in on themselves: they just happen to be what defines Gaianism. However, dedicating time and resources to this pursuit does require defining and understanding underlying motivations and reasons, and all motivations and reasons are basically rooted in belief. The holding of beliefs is an unavoidable characteristic of being human, and possibly a characteristic of any forms of intelligence that rely on abstract thinking to model reality in their brains as a way to anticipate outcomes and make decisions based on those anticipations.
Religions are not necessarily about faith in God, or belief in Gods, or even constructed around sacred texts. In order to remain consistent, Gaianism pursues accuracy and consensus, and in consequence it pays careful attention to linguistics and etymology. Etymologically, at least in English and other Latin derivatives or Latin-influenced languages, the word religion comes from the Latin religare, meaning re-ligate, reconnect, which can be interpreted as reconnecting with what's essential, the mystery of life, that which belongs in an experiential realm and cannot be communicated or explained. Linguistically, dictionaries describe it as (1) "the belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods", (2) "a particular system of faith and worship", and (3) "a pursuit or interest followed with great devotion". It is interesting noting that neither the ancient Greeks, nor the Egyptian, nor the Chinese had a word equivalent to religion. Going back to the meaning of the word derived from Latin religare, this word is most often related to the 1st meaning in the dictionary simply because in culture using Latin-derived cultures the most prevalent form of religion is that of the belief and worship of the notion of the Hebrew God Yahweh, and its later reinterpretations as Jesus in Christian Religion, and Allah in Islam. However in non-European religions, generally it relates more to the 2nd meaning (a notable exception being Vedic religion and derivatives like Hinduism), usually animism, in which there are no God or gods, such as Buddhism, Shinto, some Native American religions, and some European religions too such as the Celtic. The 3rd meaning relates to fervent customs, such as employment and consumerism, which become quasi-ritual and an essential part of people's lives and social expression. In Gaianism, religion means, specifically, a collection of shared beliefs that translate into values resulting in socially-impacting practices, whereas such beliefs are related to deities, the spiritual, or any other form of belief (i.e. that which one can't reconcile with one's factual knowledge).
There are many mysteries around our experience of being alive. For example, our sense of self, or how placebo works, or where does life (as we know it) come from or what sparked it, or if we're alone in the universe, or what happens to our subjectivity when we die. Most of what used to be mysteries until just a few years or decades, however, are now either well understood or, at least, understood to a degree that invalidates many previously held assumptions and beliefs around those mysteries. Whilst the experience of self remains a mystery, we now know a great deal about life and consciousness, for example that that we become conscious about our decisions a few milliseconds later than we actually make those decisions, and that our experience of self can be by altered by physical and psychological trauma, and that our overall experiences can be tricked, and that our experience of self is largely influenced by knowledges and beliefs. We also now know a lot more about how, at least in mammals, certain emotions depress the central nervous system causing a cascade of biochemical reactions that affects the subject's overall homeostasis eventually leading to disease, and we know what Earth life and its environment looked like when it begun spreading around the globe (cyanobacteria and an atmosphere devoid of free oxygen gas). We also know the difference between total and partial brain death, and some ways to cause reanimation of a dead animal or plant, and the suspension of their life for any period of time. We also know a great deal about social and psychological characteristics of human beings thanks to ample statistical studies, such as that children raised by a single-parent or same-sex parents can be (and often are) just as intellectually sound and emotionally stable as those raised in traditionally constituted families. Our current understanding of psychology, biology, archeology, palaeontology, physics, etc, happen to invalidate most of the traditionally held beliefs every person still holds today and rely on for everyday decision making. And this is so because science doesn't deal with values, so we continue to rely on the values we're raised with, surrounded by, or come across with through literature or other forms of communication as we develop. Whilst general scientific notions reach the everyday life of people, such as that diseases are not a divine punishment or curse and that can be cured with proper nutrition, exercise and/or medicine, or that we breathe in oxygen and breathe out carbon dioxide, most of our knowledge is not factual, but rooted in beliefs that are largely incorrect, such as that the money supply is controlled by a country's government or state, or that we need to consume large quantities of protein to get or stay strong and healthy.
It is said that science has to do with facts, and religion with values. Anyone who's not affiliated to an organised religion, or doesn't consider themselves religious, however, would passionately object to this notion. Although values are not the exclusive domain of organised religions, they are always sourced from what can be can call "religious thinking", which includes any form of faith, mysticism, magical thinking, and generally any belief or belief systems. There is almost nothing in human life that doesn't involve belief systems; even Science is ultimately based on belief systems such as ethics and humanism. Facts cannot be values, facts belong in the realm of objectivity[1], facts are facts regardless of our subjectivity. Although it is a sensible practice deriving our values from facts, holding values that are at odds with facts is folly, and these seem to comprise the great majority of values relied upon by most people in all cultures. Which brings us to Gaianism's purpose. Fulfilling on "protecting humanity", especially whilst maintaining it's principle of consistency, requires a number of beliefs that are often not aligned with long-held beliefs, often rooted in old religions or ancient mysticism, as most of them are now invalidated by current scientific knowledge. Even the linguistic constructions that we rely on for everyday communication are rooted on, and assist to the survival of, old, obsolete beliefs. In pursuing the highest effectiveness for protecting humanity, Gaianism intends to take on the most updated factual knowledge, and with it review, and update, every social value that is or can be detrimental for our long-term survival.
Notes
- ^ Objectivity is actually inaccessible, all of our knowledge is situated and subject to other related knowledge including beliefs; it can be said that there are only degrees of objectivity, and factual knowledge is characterised for a high degree of objectivity, one that is so high that is very difficult of practically impossible to disprove with current knowledge and technology.
