Editing User talk:Barretcrane
Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Andreas, thank you for your feedback! I have altered my argument to make the reasoning for including the term "settlement" and not including the term "economy" more clear. I hope this addresses your concerns on my comments about the term "economy". Please let me know if you have any other comments or critiques. [[User:Barretcrane|Barret]] | Andreas, thank you for your feedback! I have altered my argument to make the reasoning for including the term "settlement" and not including the term "economy" more clear. I hope this addresses your concerns on my comments about the term "economy". Please let me know if you have any other comments or critiques. [[User:Barretcrane|Barret]] | ||
− | Barret, thank you for the changes. I think, it is clear now, and it also matches my own understanding of the terms "resource-based", "economy" and "RBE by Jacque Fresco". However, there is a [[RBEM | + | Barret, thank you for the changes. I think, it is clear now, and it also matches my own understanding of the terms "resource-based", "economy" and "RBE by Jacque Fresco". However, there is a [[Degree of Openness of RBEM Projects|discussion]] going on how closed the experiment should be. I am a strong supporter of an open system. All aspects of the project are flexible, as long as people try to find the best solution for all participants. If they don't, I don't see a any connection to RBE or RBEM any more. [[User:Andreas|Andreas]] |