Difference between revisions of "Peritia school/Presentation"

Revision as of 18:44, 9 December 2016

The following is a work in progress draft and notes for the presentation at ZDay in Brisbane in March 2017.

Off-grid (1.4'-1.8')

Off-grid (slide: word in capitals). Many of us have dreamed with this. Earthship and strawbale buildings (pic slide), solar and wind power (pic slide), growing our own food (pic slide). Many of us associate NL/RBE with off-grid (word slide). However, it has been a defining feature of The Zeitgeist Movement to argue for staying in the cities and raising awareness from our current homes and within our current lifestyles. It is argued that if we leave the cities to protect ourselves from an impending collapse of the system, instead of being safe our homesteads will be the hungry mobs' first target. I personally can't agree more.

However, the situation is not that simple. The system has been collapsing for thirty years, and although it may be argued that it is accelerating, people are also adapting and adjusting at an accelerating rate to keep up with technology. By the looks of it, it seems like disasters due to climate change will happen sooner than the total collapse of system, which might actually help the system survive rather than challenge it.

Circular city (1-1.3')

(slide: circular city). Who here hasn't been inspired by this very image? Who of us would say "no" if we were invited to one? (slide: TVP city close-up image) How much would we be willing to work, or to compromise, for the opportunity to inhabit in a city like this? (slide: TVP science-fictiony image) These designs spark our imagination, but how viable are they? How feasible, especially if built with resources obtained in the monetary system?

(slide: circular city again) If we can't have something like this because it would be too expensive, and we can't rely on the system collapsing soon enough, what are our options other than painfully keep dreaming, and raising awareness among people that are mostly sceptical of the alternative socio-economic system we promote? Can't we have something similar in essence, but within our reach?

I think we can, and also that we must. Not to escape this system, not for our own personal sake, but rather to have something in concrete to show when promoting our alternative, and most importantly, to experiment with, and to develop from an empirical standpoint, from evidence and in practice, rather than philosophy alone.

The RBE10K Project (5')

(slide: RBE10K logo) RBE ten thousand is a project that aims at creating the blueprints for self-sufficient, sustainable, affordable, viable and realistic types of settlement, adopting the core tenets of NL/RBE. The RBE ten thousand project is defined by these goals and constraints, along with a gradual implementation strategy for global adoption in fourty years.

• (slide: M-RBE bullet point) To implement NL/RBE we must first define it well. This is a vastly complex topic, since it requires designing a whole socioeconomic system, when all other socioeconomic systems emerged naturally, like language. MRBE aims at being a small, simplified, practical and experimental form of NL/RBE, aimed at a small-to-medium community of volunteers to live in an experimental setting, and with minimal resources. Some essential characteristics would include defining clearly the goals and values of the community, privileging the providing for needs, access rather than ownership, cooperation, automated production, management and coordination where possible, intelligent and goals-focused decision-making, non-violent communication, non-blaming, no privileges other than technical ones needed for fulfilling on the agreed needs of the community, and of course, no money or commerce or the pursuit of profit.
• (slide: self-sufficiency bullet point) How can a city be self-sufficient in today's globalised world? Self-sufficiency is an ideal that can only be achieved to a certain degree. So the project must define an acceptable degree of self-sufficiency, such as producing its own energy and water, sufficiently nourishing food, and the ability to repair, reuse and recycle most of its goods and resources. This would require a population large and varied in skills enough to support itself.
• (slide: sustainability bullet point) By sustainability we refer to the capacity to endure: achieving dynamic equilibrium with the environment. Also, sustainability here is meant in all of its forms: personal, interpersonal, social and environmental.
• (slide: affordability bullet point) The resources for a settlement like this, including the human resources to populate it, must be obtained in the world we live in, i.e. the monetary market. Even if a multibillionaire donated enough resources to get one going, that would be limited to one, and would make an implementation dependent on some crazy super-rich agent. So to have this project being viable, it must be financed by the very people inhabiting it, initially to a degree average activists in rich nations can afford, and with a view to gradually reducing this cost in subsequent implementations, so that new settlements are increasingly more affordable.
• (slide: viability bullet point) A settlement like this would require complying with local and regional laws and regulations for housing and social arrangements, have legal and health protections, all while being allowed to exist but without participating in the monetary economy or producing wealth. This is probably the most difficult requirement to achieve. It would also require that its population is small enough to be manageable and to not be seen as a health hazard or a legal or social threat by the local government.
• (slide: realistic bullet point) All in all, a settlement like this must be realistic in terms of providing a lifestyle that is, in practice, more desirable for those who can afford implementing this one when compared with what the monetary market can offer them. Perhaps trading convenience for freedom, comfort for greater human interaction, sophistication for engagement.

The RBE10K Project's format and strategy 10'

(slide: RBE10K logo - Format: 10,000 x 10,000) The RBE ten thousand project's name comes from two key objectives: a population of ten thousand people per settlement, and an initial implementation cost of ten thousand US dollars per person. These numbers are arbitrary and not a strict requirement, but respond to a series of core objectives.

The population goal arises from looking for a balance between manageability and a capability for self-sufficiency, capable of providing a sense of belonging and relatedness without feeling insular, rich in variety of activities and entertainment without the alienation and the social unaccountability that comes with anonymity.

The target of ten thousand dollars per person arises from attempting to get the most money that average people who are discontent with the system can raise, at least in industrialised nations, and willing to risk in a project like this, equivalent to price of a cheap new car, or what can be raised by selling one's personal things that would no longer be needed when joining an RBE10K type of settlement.

The population size and implementation cost are variables that can be adjusted, any combination provides a starting point for defining how a settlement could look, and allow for estimating pros and cons when compared with different approaches.

The RBE ten thousand project is also about a strategy for global adoption of RBE. RBE10K type of settlements would always be built from scratch and in isolation from established settlements, designed for consistency with the core values and principles of NL/RBE, and as a way to opt-out from the monetary system in a way that is feasible, and, crucially, legal as well. No society would be sympathetic to neighbouring communities of people who do not contribute to economic growth, so it is imperative that RBE10K kind of settlements are adopted everywhere and grow in numbers faster than governments can cope with.

(slide: RBE10K logo - Strategy: exponential adoption) The strategy for rapid growth and adoption, from a single settlement to global adoption in fourty years, is inspired in biological processes. (slide: video of a cell growing) The goal for the first few months in a settlement is setting it up to a reasonable degree of workability, allowing for sustainability and self-sufficiency, ideally not more than twelve months. (slide: video of a cell splitting) After that, the goal of a community is sponsoring a sister settlement elsewhere in the world, helping organise it, and donating know-how, assistance, resources and materials for setting-it up. (slide: video of the world with random green dots growing exponentially as a year counter ticks) If each settlement sponsors and assists a new settlement every two years, especially if they exchange some of their population every time, there would be ten thousand RBE residents on the first settlement, twenty thousand RBE residents two years later, forty thousand in year four, eighty in year six, one million in year fourteen, ten million in year twenty, one hundred million in year twenty eight, one billion in year thirty-four, and finally the whole population at forty years after the first settlement. Total land use for human activities by the end of this period would reduce to one-hundredth of what's used today, allowing for wildlife to reclaim these spaces and restore its biodiversity and ecosystems, and the whole of humanity would live within its means, sustainably, with no more pollution or environmental degradation. All of this without the need for political reform, revolutions, or bloodshed; simply by increasingly opting-out from an obsolete system, becoming increasingly available to marginalised populations, and increasingly and rapidly eroding away the privileges and power of those against this mode.

Peritia School

(slide: Peritia School logo - Peritia: A proof of concept)